The Constitution Still Matters, Right?

So purple Arizona filed the first State lawsuit against President Biden’s federal vaccine requirement. Interestingly, the filing is not based on federal government overreach, or the emanations from a Constitutionally-unstated privacy penumbra for Americans (popularly: “My Body My Choice”), or the violation of the ADA that prohibits Americans being asked about their health and medical status:

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has found, for example, that an employer may not release an employee's medical records even if they are subpoenaed in a lawsuit, unless the employee consents.

Which law are we supposed to obey, and which violate? I’m confused.

States being superior in our form of government, superior Arizona is suing the inferior federal government based on the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution  through which the States created – and limited the powers of – the federal government.

It can perhaps be said that the Equal Protection Clause is at the core of the 14th Amendment. After all, this amendment was passed in the wake of the Civil War in attempts to remedy some of injustices that led up to that war, like racial inequality and slavery. While slavery is specifically dealt with in the 13th Amendment, inequality is dealt with here. Though race and racial discrimination are still at the heart of the Equal Protection Clause, any unjust government classification – the singling out of one group or another – can be a violation of the Constitution.

The clock is ticking...

By exempting illegal aliens and Afghan immigrants from a mandate for the rest of us, Biden’s diktat “singl[es] out of one group or another” of the population and treats these groups differently. (You may recall we once had a war over this.) This mandate and the exemptions are pretty much the opposite of the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, (and the Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment) and inarguably violate the Constitution. Arizona noticed and is suing to put the feds back in their Constitutional box where they belong, saying, “Yes, the Constitution does matter.”

Perhaps one of the SCOTUS precedents Democrats always demand never be overturned (“stare decisis”) has been un-overturned and reinstated and the Plessy-Ferguson “Separate but Equal” doctrine is again in force? I must have missed that memo.

If Biden’s marionette team wants to grant exemptions to employees of the Executive branch, well, that is indicative of this not being about healthcare. These employees are in every State and nearly every city in the nation spreading their unvaccinated covid viral load among the vaccinated (obviously unprotected by the “vaccine” or why worry?). Mandating the behavior of their employees is completely within the authority of the Executive branch.

Perhaps you noticed other groups exempted from the mandate, namely the Legislative branch and its staffs and the Judicial branch and its staffs. Why? Separation of Powers: The Executive cannot mandate behavior among separate, co-equal branches. The Executive can mandate behavior only to employees of the Executive Branch.

And, guess what? I’m not an employee of the Executive Branch. Separation of Powers and non-Enumerated Powers. Zero Constitutional authority was granted to the federal executive to mandate my behavior. Since I am not their employee, they can’t police my behavior. The states did not grant that authority to the feds.

We're from the FBI and we're here to help.

Why? The superior states also did not grant to the inferior federal government “general police powers;” these were reserved by the states. What does that mean? It means the feds can’t “police” me. States reserved police powers, as well as all powers not specifically granted to the feds. See Article 1, Section 8 for a listing of those specific enumerated powers. Healthcare is not among these, nor is any power over what to inject into your body.

See the Ninth and Tenth Amendments – the final two amendments of the Bill of Rights, without which the Constitution would not have been ratified, nor the nation created – for all powers not granted to the feds.

The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. [Ninth]

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people. [Tenth]

But, wait, you say? The Executive Branch, via “rule making,” creates arbitrary rules governing individual behavior all the time. True. And yet, the very first sentence of the Constitution reads:

All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.

Let me repeat that: “All…”

What is the difference between legislation ("laws") that can deprive Americans of life, liberty or property and “rules” that can deprive Americans of life, liberty or property? Spelling.

The honorable gentlelady: Congress at work.

Congress loves to dispose of its accountability by tossing too-hot-to-touch issues over to the Executive branch. Say, like a mandate for an injection you may not want to take. Nothing in the Constitution (to which they must take an oath to support in order to be seated in Congress – and should be expelled for violating) authorizes their doing so.

So the feds lack the power to police the behavior of individuals, and the feds must treat all Americans equally, and the president cannot make law. All of these are violated by the vaccine mandate; only Equal Protection is being tested by Arizona.

Now we shall see, again, whether the Supreme Court, also a creature of the federal government and also limited by that same Constitution to the powers and authority that limit the Executive and Legislative branches, is going to find a way to interpret a power the inferior federal government lacks (i.e. “invent” or “usurp”) to the detriment of the states that created the feds as their creature, and to the citizens of those superior states...

… and whether the Constitution and Rule of Law still exist in America.

A Nation of Lions, Led by a Goat

My last piece on the CCP virus included this observation:  “It seems odd that the more research and information we have on Covid-19 and its treatments, the worse the story gets.” Stepping up to the challenge, the media and their “experts” just made everything, well, “worse.” (What would we do without experts?)

CNN Medical Analyst, Dr Leana Wen, had this to say:

“And those who are vaccinated, we now know based on the CDC, they are now able, with the Delta variant, because they carry so much more virus, they could transmit it to their unvaccinated family members.”

I’m not a doctor, but I am pretty sure this is the opposite of how vaccines are supposed to work. Dr. Wen notes that her own vaccination now is a threat to her children as they are too young to be vaccinated. I am a parent, and I am quite sure becoming a threat to your children via a non-medically-necessary choice, is the opposite of how parenthood is supposed to work.

Uncle Joe’s demand/threat that we all get vaccinated or lose our homes and jobs, starve to death, become unable to travel, cash a check, use a credit card, etc., now seems designed to, what? Get everyone sick?

Remain calm! All is well!

I’ve been trying since we all were scolded by the president for being adults and making our own decisions in what once was a free country (but at least not (yet) a prison colony), to figure out the Kafkaesque nature of his demand. (It’s so good to have an adult of whom we can be proud back in the Oval Office.) I am pretty sure his tirade can be summarized as below:

The vaccinated demand the unvaccinated get vaccinated to protect the vaccinated from the virus against which the vaccinated were vaccinated.

Do I have that right?

But if we “follow the science,” at least according to CNN’s Medical Analyst, quoting the CDC, Joe has it exactly backward: It’s the vaccinated who are a risk to the unvaccinated. But that’s par for the course with Joe; he’s always been wrong.

But I guess the Powers That Be experimenting on children will fix that, seeing that they now are testing these gene-altering inoculations (I think we’re past the idea these are “vaccines”) on kids whose IFR is about 0.001, so we can do – what… make kids superspreaders, too? And the teacher unions are demanding we turn every child into a superspreader in order to get our children back in school… where they can… infect everyone? Is that what the most powerful Democrat-supporting union in America sees as our way forward? OK. I’ll admit it. I’m confused.

But at least BigPharma will make bank, and that’s the goal, right? Just like the Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Congressional-Complex making bank in our un-won / refuse-to-win “wars.” It’s been a long time since I was in the military, but nowadays it costs $768,000,000,000 – annually – to prepare for wars we plan to lose? (Plus, of courses, the $10,000,000,000 we used to fund the Taliban military effort.)

What, me worry?

Meanwhile, back in the state-whose-governor-just-got-fired-for-molesting-women, hospitals are closing departments; (irony alert) maternity, for instance (pretty sure maternity is a non-optional event once labor begins, but I’m not a “body with a vagina,” so maybe I have that wrong? Perhaps a birthing person can enlighten me?), or are just closing entirely.

President Biden’s vaccine mandate for healthcare workers may have “devastating” effects on rural hospitals, as a fully vaccinated staff will become a requirement for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement. Jerry Jasper, CEO at Brownfield Regional Medical Center in Texas, said that while most of his staff are vaccinated, there are about “20 to 25 percent” who are not. Losing those employees may be the end of the hospital, he told KCBD.

Not sure how forcing hospitals to close in the midst of a pandemic is good for the people in the area, but I’m not a Democrat policy maker or voter.

The new governor of New York, on the other hand, has a solution in two parts:

  1. Bring in the NY Guard to staff the hospitals, and,
  2. Bring in foreigners to staff the hospitals.

Maybe she can get some of the illegals crossing the Rio Grande to staff her hospitals. They don’t have to be vaccinated so easily can replace the American workers who have been on the front lines of Covid for 18 months and know the dangers better than any and so are rejecting the jab at high rates across the country -- and so getting fired. The thousands under the bridge must include at least a few nurses. Bonus: they work at a lower cost than American medical staff and can help the Late Great State of New York recover some of the costs incurred by killing about 12,000 elderly. (Or was that a reduction in healthcare costs by killing about 12,000 elderly? Again, I am confused…)

Plus you get free ice cream!

My gosh, it’s good to have competent government again. Wide-open borders, a rout of our military, energy re-dependendence, a virus that is being treated to excellent results in non-Western countries but is killing people in America because those treatments are essentially outlawed, massive spikes of the WuFlu in the countries most-vaccinated (and here), hospitals closing because the medical professionals are rejecting a vaccination, and the vaccinated being the biggest risk to the unvaccinated our president is demanding get vaccinated.

Or else.

Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Covid?

It seems odd that the more research and information we have on Covid-19 and its treatments, the worse the story gets.

For the first time in history, the reaction to a virus is to shut down an entire polity and economy – workers, businesses, groceries, transportation, entertainment – regardless of infection. It seems that the more advanced a society is, the more primitive its responses to disease. Why?

Still-living generations of men and women who stood-up to tyrants in WW2 suddenly cower in their closets, allowing government to destroy the world they had sacrificed so much to save.

Their children, the infamous Baby Boomers, ‘Cry “OMG!” and loose the dogs of quarantine.’

THEIR children, raised with more freedom and prosperity than any generation in the history of the known universe, wet their beds and fink on their neighbors if Johnny is out without a mask.

The countries with the highest levels of vaccination now are experiencing the highest levels of infection. Governments are talking about three jabs, four jabs, annual jabs – forever. Countries that are not participating in the orgy of self-destruction that is consuming most of the West, on the other hand, seem to be doing far better. (Newsflash-1: Almost everyone who gets it – gets over it. Newsflash-2: We’re ALL going to get it.)

The government statistics on lethality are here. Basically, if you are under 80 years of age and are not morbidly obese, this is not going to kill you.

Every study looking at the issue has arrived at the conclusion that natural immunity is both stronger and more long-lasting than artificial immunity that comes from the muzzle of a syringe. Natural immunity is achieved by having one’s body infected and the infection successfully fought-off.

Infection: Antibodies: Immunity.

Get it: Get over it: Immunity.

But … the media and government tell you: We can’t get over it! We’ll all DIE!

For reasons both unknown and uninvestigated both our government and its media scribes are working together to suppress information about, and prohibit usage of, proven treatments; the “get over it” part of the problem.

Get it: Get over it: Immunity…. does not seem to be a goal of the ruling class…

In Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis has been pushing monoclonal antibodies as treatment, with tthese results:

(The government is restricting the distribution of monoclonal antibodies.)

As many have noted, ivermectin, a Nobel-prize-winning antiviral and a drug on the WHO list of critical drugs, kills 99.98 percent of the viral load in 48 hours (and here). HCQ has similar results.

(The government and BigPharma are restricting the distribution of ivermectin and HCQ.)

A new Nitric Oxide nasal spray (NONS) seems to kill the virus in several days.

(If I were a betting man, my money would be on government prohibiting distribution, usage & dissemination of information on NONS once it's proven useful.)

All of these are drugs and treatments long in use, which kill the virus in the infected. Infection: antibodies: immunity.

Many people – about half the country – are enthralled by mRNA vaccines. At the same time, the CDC is looking at a “higher than expected” rate of myocarditis among recipients of mRNA vaccines. The five-year mortality of those diagnosed with myocarditis is 72.4 percent. Three quarters of those so diagnosed will likely die within five years.

The face-mask monster, sighted in Berlin.

This peer-reviewed report on Myocarditis is astounding and should be read in its entirety, but a few quotes are in order here. [references in the linked paper]:

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) finds increased reported cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, most notably in adolescents and young adults, including in the absence of COVID-19 infection. Myocarditis was only rarely found post-vaccination prior to the COVID mRNA vaccines.

However, it has recently been determined that the delivery of spike proteins and / or their generating mechanisms, as with all known injected substances, do indeed diffuse and travel in an organism, away from the site of injection, in accordance with well-established principles of circulation, throughout the body, including to internal organs.  Organs that have been affected by this body-wide distribution have included the heart, brain, spleen and liver, with especially high concentrations found in the ovaries and the plasma.…

It has been observed also that mRNA interventions are fragile and unpredictable in their effect, and have been seen to damage mitochondria by a number of known mechanisms. Of patients hospitalized for COVID-19, myocarditis-pattern injury was observed in 4.5% to 27% of cases. Moreover, in the event of SARS-CoV-2 infection, it was found that the associated cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic effects were sufficient to abolish cardiomyocyte beating (contraction-relaxation cycles). However, direct virus replication was not found on examination of the myocardium, and SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not found in the cardiomyocytes.  Therefore, it is worthwhile to examine if post-vaccine myocarditis is likely to be caused by spike proteins generated by the vaccines.

The spike proteins that are generated by the mRNA COVID vaccines are said to be identical to those attached to SARS-CoV-2. The spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 is a trimeric, or three-part protein, composed of two functional S1 subunits, as well as a structural S2 subunit.  Each of those three units are, incidentally, bound and inactivated by the drug ivermectin.

In sum, the mRNA vaccines – unexpectedly – create spike proteins throughout the body – for how long no one knows.  These spike proteins kill heart cells that do not regenerate. Kill enough and you will die: 72% mortality within five years. (Unanswered question: What do these circulating spike proteins do in fetal hearts only building their cells for the first time?) And FDA-approved drug treatments that stop the above lethal processes are prohibited by the government and Big Pharma.

By forcing non-vaccinating (they don't prevent infection or spread) mRNA "vaccines," probably forever, when we know, at best, they reduce symptoms but do not create herd immunity (and here), and that may cause myocarditis, when we do have drugs and treatments that kill the virus in the infected - who then will develop long-term (and herd) immunity, we are being forced to prolong the virus and prohibited from ending its threat.

Why?  Why? Why?

 

Regarding Covid, What Are 'Breakthroughs'?

Amid the welter of conflicting reports, contradictory information, breathless warnings and a veritable blizzard of confusing statistics regarding the efficacy of the Covid vaccines, especially with respect to the Delta variant, one is hard put to determine a proper course of action. Should people enthusiastically embrace the official push to vaccine compliance or retain a saving skepticism about these new wonder drugs, which have been rushed to market in record time and in a manner granting pharmaceutical companies immunity from liability?

In my estimation, there is every reason to remain skeptical. Organizations like Global Research, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeonstotalhealth.uk., the Belgian Medical Doctors and Health Professionals, various European Union Agencies and the CDC itself tell us that the vaccines are by no means reliable and may be hazardous to your health. In some cases, they may even be lethal. And most such findings are underreported by a factor of at least 5, since these rely on passive, voluntary sites like VAERS in the U.S. and Yellow Card in the U.K. 

Dr. Peter Doshi writes in the BMJ (British Medical Journal), a subsidiary of the British Medical Association, that the world:

has bet the farm on vaccines as the solution to the pandemic, but the trials are not focused on answering the questions many might assume they are… None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus… the truth is that the science remains far from clear cut.

As if this were not enough to induce a certain lack of confidence, renowned cardiologist Peter McCullough has added his testimony to the debate, asserting that the vaccines are not safe and should not be recommended. He is one of many.

A new category of alarm has recently entered the discussion about the prevalence of what are called “breakthrough cases” where the vaccines do not appear to have provided reliable immunity from the disease and its variants. Again, the statistics are confounding, depending on where one gets one’s information. On the one hand, breakthroughs may be infinitesimal. On the other, breakthroughs may be distressingly frequent, fully vaccinated people displaying all the symptoms of the disease. Which is it? I suspect that the fly in the ointment is more like the elephant in the room. 

Just say... let's think about it.

U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams, while recommending vaccination, admits that vaccines “still don't prevent the spread of the disease because of the mutation.” The New York Post reports on a CDC study claiming that the virus, primarily in the form of the Delta variant, and may be transmissible by vaccinated people who suffer “breakthrough” infections. A Covid-19 outbreak in Massachusetts occurred mainly among vaccinated people: “74 percent occurred among the fully vaccinated, according to a new CDC study.” The beat goes on.

The vaccines may be not only harmful as many top-tier virologists and immunologists have stated, but also basically ineffective against the virus. There is, however, another possibility to consider. As I have written in a previous article for The Pipeline, world-celebrated virologist and Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier argues: 

the vaccines and viral variants go hand in hand, owing to a condition called antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), a phenomenon in which virus-specific antibodies enhance the entry of the virus and may also cause viral replication. Variants will continue to proliferate as a direct result of the vaccines themselves.

His explication is technically complex but convincing, in my opinion. (Montagnier has been panned by “liberal” sites galore, but his credentials are impeccable and theirs are not.) Similarly, the highly respected medical journal Vaccine has released a study exposing the danger of vaccine-caused long-term healing complications. This means that the vaccines could aggravate viral infections, resulting in a “covid spike.” 

If such is in fact the case, the vaccines themselves may be responsible for the emergence of breakthroughs. Indeed, the word “breakthrough” may be deceptive. What we may be witnessing is not a “breakthrough” but a malignant side-effect of the vaccine itself, which will continue to be touted as an antidote when it might well be an amplifier.

Theories and hypotheses will obviously continue to abound and the issue will remain vexed, but there is more than sufficient confusion being generated to warrant at least some degree of hesitancy. The stakes are too serious to fiddle with solutions that could prove to be toxins, in particular when there exist benign remedies and countermeasures like HCQ, Ivermectin, Zinc and Vitamin D3 supplements, when natural immunity is a significant factor, and when the recovery rate for the vast majority is extraordinarily high, as even the CDC has admitted. (Warning: do not trust the preponderance of hostile social media and progressivist “factcheckers” that have adopted a duplicitous label.)

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

The first principle of the Nuremberg Code treating of medical ethics establishes reads:

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should…be able to exercise free power of choice, without…any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

The issue is that the plethora of conflicting reports renders an informed decision regarding taking the vaccine difficult to make. Under the circumstances, it should certainly not be mandated. It should be left up to the individual to determine whether or not he will allow a problematic substance to be injected into his body. 

The real breakthrough would be to lucidly consider one’s options, to be skeptical of an officialdom that had far too much skin in the game of persuasion, profit and power, and to refuse to be stampeded into unreasoning panic.

To Control the Feds, Unleash the States

The question “How do we get the federal government under control?” has gained added urgency as the political establishment has usurped enormous and authoritarian power via this virus and its responses to it. This is the wrong question.

We concern ourselves with lockdown-driven suicides, spouse and child abuse, drug overdoses and soon to be another year of our children not being educated. Why? Because we are asking the above question – which is unanswerable – rather than understanding that the federal government has no direct interest in the pathologies it has created. These are State issues, community issues, family issues.

Solutions – easy, proven, available solutions to the failures of the establishment regarding Covid-19 exist. These solutions follow precedents of Blue nanny states now demanding that non-Democrat voters be put under the thumb of their political establishments.

The recently-published WSJ report on ivermectin, along with other studies published by NIH and the facts on the ground, show that this FDA-approved, proven, inexpensive, widely-available drug destroys Covid19 rapidly across the entire body.

Ivermectin fights 21 viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, the cause of Covid-19. A single dose reduced the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in cells by 99.8% in 24 hours and 99.98% in 48 hours…

Whatever happened to "first, do no harm"?

Contrast this with recently-published German study that a man (old and with comorbidities, but without Covid) was admitted to the hospital 18 days after receiving an mRNA vaccine, and (after the hospital took a play from Governor Cuomo’s playbook and rolled-in an infected roommate) got Covid and died on day 25 post-vaccine, and the virus – against which he had been vaccinated – had infested every organ in his body but his liver.

Postmortem molecular mapping by real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed relevant SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold values in all organs examined (oropharynx, olfactory mucosa, trachea, lungs, heart, kidney and cerebrum) except for the liver and olfactory bulb.

Couple these two pieces of information with the recently-leaked  AstraZeneca internal study of the efficacy of its own vaccine in six countries in Europe (France, Germany, Austria, the UK, Norway, Italy). AstraZeneca (“AstraZeneca confirms that it authored the document. This information was not intended for public release”) is finding an average kill-rate of the Pfizer “vaccine” across these six countries to be 53 per million vaccinated. The AstraZeneca study also shows that AstraZeneca’s mRNA “vaccine” kills at a third of this rate.

According to the statistics submitted by the governments and related medical agencies, France registered 45.3 fatal cases per million doses for Pfizer versus 17.9 for AstraZeneca. For Germany, the numbers are 29.9 versus 6.5, respectively, for the UK — 20.7 and 24.2, Norway — 164.3 and 44.6, Austria — 47.5 and 7.5, and Italy — 10.9 and 7.3.

The average kill rate of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine, according to AstraZeneca’s own study, is 53.1 per million jabbed across these countries. For AstraZeneca’s, 18 per million jabbed. As of 30 July 2021, 344 million jabs have been given in the US. If half of those were Pfizer and half were AstraZeneca, AstraZeneca’s own numbers, extrapolated to the American population would indicate 9,207 deaths from the Pfizer vaccine and 3,067 from AstraZeneca: 12,000 Americans. If one factors-in J&J, the Pfizer and AstraZeneca kill rates per million remain: the kills are fewer across a minimally-smaller jabbed population, but the point is the same: These mRNA vaccines are killing tens of thousands around the globe – randomly – and the manufacturers of them know it.

Which means the feds know it, too.

You probably be fine. Maybe.

The final piece: The federal government is considering that all federal employees must be vaccinated. Many states are issuing directives. Many colleges and universities and major corporations are directing their students and employees:  vax or you’re out.

That’s the problem. So why is asking how to control the feds the wrong question?

The fact is that the feds have no authority to mandate masks or drugs. But the states do. The states also have the authority to reject mandates the federal government is not empowered to make, as has been shown by governors DeSantis and Noem regarding lockdowns, masking, etc.

It is time to address the right question: What can states do to protect their citizens? After all, isn’t protecting our citizens and their families the priority here?

Skip all the nonsense around masks and when St. Anthony of Fauci said that the “vaccine” meets no current definition of a vaccine (it doesn’t prevent infection, doesn’t provide lasting immunity, doesn’t prevent spreading), nothing is stopping individual states from buying and creating a supply of ivermectin for their citizens. Nothing.

Federalism. Try it; you’ll like it.

Governors Noem and DeSantis seem to have the cojones to keep their citizens safe. Given the global reaction to the mRNA vaccines and the political and corporate establishment’s demand that we all inject ourselves with a drug currently killing tens of thousands, creating a state supply of working, proven, FDA-approved, non-experimental drugs that KILL Covid, rather than people, well..

Rather than mandating drugs that DO NOT attack the virus but may kill you – governors providing to the citizens of their states drugs that do work to kill – and to stop – this virus – seems a logical, inexpensive, fast way forward out of this pandemic. And keeps the pathologically power-mad authoritarians in DC away from our citizens.

People wouldn’t be moving out of Blue nanny-states just for job opportunities, affordable housing, lower taxes, higher quality of life, fewer interactions with gangs, avoidance of BLM-OFA-Antifa rioting that has become a feature of Blue Metros.

They’d be moving to save their lives and those of their families.

Who's Afraid of the CCP Vaccine?

It wasn’t George Orwell’s animals or calendar, or Ray Bradbury’s firemen or Anthony Burgess’ clockwork that ought to have worried us. No; it was Mary Shelley’s doctor.

Some animals always have been – and always will be – more equal than others. Though today’s “equity” totalitarianism denies this, studies of global population IQ are definitive. If the Left really thought we all were equal, they’d not be replacing Equal Opportunity with Equity, itself an acknowledgement of inequality.

A danger exists within “equity.” As Louis Marano notes in his review of Charles Murray’s new book, Facing Reality, a look at disparities between humans:

The disaster materializes if the white majority gets fed up, has had enough, and pushes back. Or, in Murray’s words, “when working-class and middle-class Whites adopt identity politics.”

One might recall what Admiral Yamamoto is supposed to have said after Pearl Harbor – another attack on the American society… "I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve." He ought to know, since he planned the attack himself.

Welcome to the brave new world.

Today’s Left may be intrigued by the Brave New World idea of growing fetuses in a bottle and injecting different proteins to create a worker, a drone, a consultant or an elite – but they seem more interested in killing fetuses and babies. They aren’t worried about the constant telescreen – they carry one in their pocket.

Amazon already has perfected burning disliked books: Move the reader to Kindle and then alter or remove the content however and whenever desired without reader awareness. Or stop selling it, having run nearly all local retailers out of business.

We’ve been watching the clockworkian dystopia burn our cities, murder our cops and attack innocents for over a year – no one seems to mind; at least not enough to do anything about it other than increase the dosage in our soma by defunding cops, releasing perps with no bail, no charge, no trial to do it all again.

But Ms. Shelley’s doctor created a technology with which her society was unable to deal. The result was murderous. Our doctors today? Easy: Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Tony Fauci. The results are worse.

Eeek.

We aren’t talking about a single monster of technology turned loose to terrorize. No, we’re looking at real Frankenstein monsters, monsters of technology we are so far unwilling to control, attacking liberty and freedom and prosperity and the future - globally. We have, to our detriment, fallen in love with our monsters. Try to get a friend off Zuckerberg’s monster, or Dorsey’s. How many of us refuse Bezos’ wares to support local businesses?

Before our wonderful vaccine technology advanced so far that we don’t even need normal trial durations before turning it loose, we dealt differently with diseases.

I was born in the 1950s. I’m not anti-vax. My generation still has the scar on our left shoulder from smallpox vaccine. We ate a sugar cube laced with polio vaccine. But those were (and this is a term of art) “perfect” vaccines. We didn’t have vaccines for mumps (which, if a boy didn’t get it before puberty, might make him sterile) or German measles (which, if a woman got it during pregnancy, her baby stood a good chance of birth defects) or chicken pox (a mild form of herpes as a kid, a serious problem as an adult). What did we do?

Easy – when a kid got the mumps, all the parents sent their sons over to play and spend the night. When a kid got the measles… when a kid got chicken pox. It was, seriously, a party. Hang out with your buds, have some pizza, get sick, get over it, be immune the rest of your life.

But the BigPharma/BigGov response to the good Dr. Fauci’s function-gained bat flu technology has changed all that. Not only did we not have a party, we locked-up those with no chance of a serious illness or death so that we could not gain permanent immunity. And now we have a vaccine that is (another term of art) “leaky.”

The other good doctors of social media then refused any discussion not supportive of their – uneducated – narrative, including all discussion of decades-old medicines that showed positive results by the millions: Ivermectin and HCQ.

The doctor is our friend.

What is a “leaky vaccine?” This is a good piece describing “leaky” and “perfect” vaccines in layperson terminology. (emphasis mine)

The deadliest strains of viruses often take care of themselves — they flare up and then die out. This is because they are so good at destroying cells and causing illness that they ultimately kill their host before they have time to spread.

But a chicken virus that represents one of the deadliest germs in history breaks from this conventional wisdom, thanks to an inadvertent effect from a vaccine. Chickens vaccinated against Marek’s disease rarely get sick. But the vaccine does not prevent them from spreading Marek’s to unvaccinated birds.

“With the hottest strains, every unvaccinated bird dies within 10 days. There is no human virus that is that hot. Ebola, for example, doesn’t kill everything in 10 days.”

And how is the CCP Virus vaccine described? Stop me if you’ve heard this, but, per PBS,

Vaccines don’t always prevent infection,

and, per the CDC,

… people fully vaccinated with an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) are less likely to have asymptomatic infection or to transmit SARS-CoV-2 to others.

"Less likely." Sounds "leaky," right? These not-quite-a-vaccination “leaky” jabs allow the host (you) to continue spreading the virus, allowing it to get “hotter” (more lethal).

Ms. Shelley’s monster now is among us, let-loose by our new Dr. Frankensteins, with millennia-old, successful, practices of virus immunization rejected by the same “experts” who created it and who quash all discussion of alternatives.