The Coming Viral Dictatorship

A pivotal feature of dictatorial regimes is the institutional lie, expressed as an unfounded message of millennial hope, an ever-changing set of legislated policies, and the tendency of authoritarian leaders to violate their own axioms and edicts. We see this happening before our eyes as a Covid-19 tyranny takes root on our own soil.

The manifold inconsistencies and deceptions that circulate regarding the draconian mandates and coercive measures imposed by Big Government to combat the Covid pandemic should by now have alerted the public to their suspicious nature. We have observed the extent to which these ordinances are regularly flouted by the authorities, who have been seen without their masks, disregarding social distancing rules, and travelling during lockdowns. Such exemptions are obviously a privilege reserved only to the elites, who do not scruple to lecture us on the current proprieties.

One popular slogan that we meet everywhere, on radio and TV, on the Internet, and emblazoned on ubiquitous signage, is particularly irritating: “We’re All In This Together.” Clearly, we are not. While small business owners and entrepreneurs struggle with bankruptcy as their establishments are closed down, Big Box stores operate at full capacity, teachers retain handsome salaries while refusing to enter their classrooms, government personnel continue to be paid in absentia, and politicians suffer no loss of ample remuneration.

This means you.

Weddings, church services, funerals, social gatherings, holiday celebrations and anti-lockdown protests are either curtailed or banned to prevent proximity transmission of the virus; BLM demonstrations involving thousands of people cheek-by-jowl agitating for “social justice” are permitted and encouraged. Doctors are here to serve their patients; now many have embraced telemedicine, which does not impact their fees as it does their effectiveness. Diagnosis at a distance is not reliable medicine, though it is lucrative medicine. The overall hypocrisy that confronts us at every level of political, corporate and professional society is so blatant as to be unbelievable—except it is entirely believable. We are manifestly not in this all together, not by a long shot.

Another sedative to which we are constantly exposed is the official platitude that the mandates under which we malinger are intended “to protect public health and safety.” The collateral effects of this faux campaign have, in fact, endangered public health and safety. The category of “excess deaths” owing to delayed medical procedures for cancer, Alzheimer's, heart ailments and diabetes, among other conditions, including critical stress, depressive suicides, and adverse reactions and deaths linked to the Covid vaccines now arguably surpass Covid morbidity numbers—which themselves appear to have been grossly inflated. Indeed, in a crowning irony, the virus may itself be “boosted” by iatrogenic interventions. One need only consult virologist and immunologist Robert Malone, the actual inventor of the mRNA vaccines, who warns against them as Covid-19 suppressants. 

We were assured that vaccine passports were the route to “public health and safety” and that life would soon be back to normal. Now triple vaxxing, masks and renewed lockdowns have become mandatory in many jurisdictions and nations. The temptation to blame and penalize the unvaccinated for any upsurge of “cases” is spreading and may easily translate into second-class status for the unvaccinated and a policy of forced internment. 

But who are the “unvaccinated”?  Israel’s Director of the Ziv Medical Center Dr. Salman Zarka admits that the definition is changing: “We are updating what it means to be vaccinated.” In the absence of a third jab (and counting), even the double-vaxxed fall into the category of “unvaccinated.” As Kit Knightly writes in off-guardian, “Israel is the petri dish”; if it works there, the rest of the world will follow suit. Of course, in another sense of the phrase, it doesn’t really “work there.” A multi-sourced chart published in the Financial Times, comparing over-vaxxed Israel to under-vaxxed Egypt, provides a sobering metric. Egypt is doing at least an order of magnitude better than Israel. Equally distressing, on August 22 West Virginia governor Jim Justice reported a 26 percent surge among the fully vaccinated and a 25 percent increase in vaccinated deaths. This surely is not a one-off.

Where do you think you're going?

It should be obvious by this time that we are dealing with a vast shell game. In an open letter to the Canadian Minister of Health, McGill University theology professor Douglas Farrow argues, correctly, that vaccine mandates are incoherent. That is surely the right word. Masks were supposed to keep us safe. They didn’t do very well, so the first jab was introduced, which should have offered immunity. Then came a second jab, followed by a third and counting. Then came the vaccine passports. Meanwhile, as noted, double-and-triple-jabbed Israelis are still fighting infection and transmission and have now even been refused entry to Portugal and to open, prosperous Sweden.

It is no surprise, at least among the concerned, that distrust is growing of our health authorities, the political class and the collusive “misleadia,” assiduously promoting a medical dogma that is plainly muddled, deceptive and hypocritical. It is also, to put it bluntly, totalitarian.

The next step is the construction of quarantine or internment camps, as currently planned in Australia. Similarly, in the U.S. the CDC has proposed a “shielding approach” that would establish “a group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector…where high-risk individuals (the unvaccinated) are physically isolated together.” As if this weren’t plain enough, the proposal states that “High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level… They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.” 

Meanwhile, the National Guard is in process of hiring “internment resettlement specialists” to supervise detention operations and “provide guidance to individual prisoners.” It is not clear from the explanatory description what this program precisely entails, but it doesn’t augur well. On August 6, 2021, governor Bill Lee of Tennessee signed an executive order authorizing involuntary internment of targeted citizens, under the convenient designation of “regulatory flexibilities.”

Not to be outdone, the Department of Homeland Security claims that those resisting the vaccines pose a “potential terror threat.” If you oppose the vaccines, you are an “extremist.” The document is very clear: “These extremists may seek to exploit the emergence of COVID-19 variants by viewing the potential re-establishment of public health restrictions across the United States as a rationale to conduct attacks.” Bill HR 4980 currently before Congress would place unvaccinated persons on a No-Fly list and lead inexorably to a No-Buy gun control law. A No-Buy gun list would prevent people from arming themselves. As they say, you have been warned.

Welcome to Australia.

My own country of Canada marches in lockstep with the heavily mandated nations of Israel, the U.K. and, of course, Australia and parts of the U.S. According to NaturalNews, the Canadian government has ordered enough vaccines to inoculate every man, woman and child many times over for the next three years, having stockpiled 293 million doses for a population of 38 million. The report continues: Just months ago, the Covid-19 vaccines were hailed as a ‘miracle of science’ that were putting an ‘end to the pandemic’… But now the narrative has changed” and we can expect more censorship, travel restriction, contact tracing, deprivation of human rights, dodgy testing, and mask and vaccine mandates. The fear is that even supermarkets may eventually be placed off limits for the unvaccinated, forcing one to rely on doorstep deliveries. 

As we’ve seen, this despotic program is being implemented in the name of “protecting public health and safety.” It appears, rather, as if it is being put in practice to create a system of “vaccine enslavement” and authoritarian control. Our Prime Minister, after all, is on record as admiring the “basic dictatorship” of Communist China.

What next? One shudders to think. Where next? Who's next?

The Battle of Tinhorn Flats, Continued

The Burbank City Council has lost its collective mind, pursuing an obvious vendetta against Tinhorn Flats restaurant, a family-owned and operated business that has been part of the community for 50 years. Back in December, the Lepejian family made the difficult decision to defy state and local closure orders and serve food on its back patio, while following all previously established outdoor dining protocols.

Since then, lawsuits have been flying.  A judge ordered L.A. County to provide scientific evidence to support its mandate closing all dining, which the county obviously could not produce.  Yet the judge did not lift the ban on dining because Governor Gavin Newsom’s stay-at-home order was still in effect.

The county then revoked Tinhorn’s health permits, and the Burbank city council then began an ill-advised campaign of governmental tyranny.  Not only did the council revoke the restaurant’s relevant permits, it got a judge to sign off on cutting the power to the facility.

Tinhorn Flats' patrons and other patriots donated generators and barbecues and the restaurant continued to serve, as well as opening up its bar for indoor dining as the state approved that activity for all establishments.

The city council then tried to padlock the restaurant’s door shut.  Lucas Lepejian, the 20-year-old who currently oversees operations at the restaurant, cut the locks.  Since then, the city has boarded up the entrances, “red-tagged” the joint as being unsafe to enter, placed a mountain of sandbags in front of the boarded entrances and surrounded the entire place with a chain-link fence.

Lucas has since been arrested three times, twice for violating a court order and the third time for “altering efforts the city has implemented to prevent entry into the establishment, due to the unsafe conditions and to be compliant with the city’s safety codes.”  That is, trying to remove the sandbags.

Burbank police have been sauntering around the establishment for a couple of weeks, shouting at anyone who gets too close.  The BPD even rolled out an entire squad of police to make sure nobody got in the way of the fence installation.

Yippie-ki-yay, you know who.

Given that the rest of the state is finally re-opening, the council is engaging in this absurd display for one reason: punishment for defiance.  Even nearby Ventura County, which also was bringing action against a handful of restaurants for defying local orders, has dropped all the cases.

The behavior of the council is not merely demonstrative of governmental overreach, but of the insidious side of handing power to a group of five citizens.  Remember, these politicians are nothing special.  They are just regular people without any particular expertise in anything.  Government should always act with prudence, yet the ferocity with which the council has assaulted this business is chilling.

So what’s going on and what is the future for the restaurant?  Is the entire council really this stupid and short-sighted? Most politicians are savvy enough to recognize potential blowback that could harm them.

It appears that it is just one city councilman that wants to escalate the situation: radical leftist actor  Konstantine Anthony. Slightly more than three weeks ago, a judge ordered the restaurant and the Council to settle the matter.  Based on interviews with Lucas on local media, the restaurant was open to discussion and apparently everyone on the Council except Anthony was ready to talk.

In a phone conversation between Lucas and Anthony, recorded and posted on social media, it appears that Anthony was the sole holdout in refusing to even discuss settlement. Why?

Normally, when a judge orders parties to talk, they talk.  The point is to resolve matters, and the Burbank council had every reason to do so.  The more protracted the battle, the more money the city must spend on it, and the more exposed it becomes to future liability from civil lawsuits.

There is only one rational conclusion to draw from Anthony’s defiance.  He wants to punish Tinhorn Flats.   This makes perfect sense, however, when one realizes that Anthony appears to be a self-described “Trotsky Communist”.

He spoke favorably of a Seattle City Councilmember who is a Trotsky Communist, and appears to tacitly admit his position in a January 26 open council meeting.  He was also endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America, and is a “dues-paying member of DSA-LA.  He was also endorsed by OurRevolution, an offshoot of the Bernie Sanders 2016 campaign.  A social media post with his name says that his goal is to “dismantle capitalism.”

This is a sad state of affairs for the city.  Anthony himself claims to be autistic, was once homeless and claims that “my kindness is modeled after my mother’s, who emigrated from Greece in 1977.”  Anthony is not showing either kindness or grace in this matter.  He’s demonstrating his hatred of capitalism.

The road back for Tinhorn Flats will be lengthy and challenging.  Although they’ve hired the tenacious and effective attorney Mark Geragos, and have tripled their GoFundMe goal of $30,000, the legal situation is a mess.

On the one hand, an LA County judge already has ruled that the county failed to show cause for the dining closure while failing to lift the ban.  That issue has now become moot.  So the question is whether Geragos can get a ruling that the initial closure was improper, and therefore all the activities the county and city engaged in to strip the restaurant of its permits were also improper.

Depending on the specific arguments presented, there may also be a Fifth Amendment challenge for illegal takings.  If the city engages in a permanent improper closure and fails to compensate the restaurant, that may constitute an illegal taking.

Yet another wrinkle is that the city’s actions fall under administrative law, and courts generally give administrative proceedings broad authority.  The key argument in administrative actions is if they were “arbitrary and capricious.”  That in turn would depend on whether the restaurant shutdowns can be shown to have been without merit.

All of these issues will take months if not years to resolve.  In the meantime, unless a settlement is reached, the restaurant faces an uphill battle to reopen.  If the Lepejians do prevail, the city may face significant civil liability, and Anthony alone may face a recall campaign.

Meanwhile, Burbank faces fiscal problems like most other Democrat-controlled municipalities.  There is a $29 million budget shortfall, and fully a third of the budget goes to pay pensions – with unfunded liabilities amounting to over $17 million annually. Is the Battle of Tinhorn Flats really a fight Burbank wants to continue?

How to Dodge the Dreaded Covid

The sheer absurdity of the Covid hoax in one brief video:

Take off your muzzle, throw it in the trash, and never use it again. You're a citizen of a free republic, not a subject of a tinpot tyranny.

One Age, Two Zeitgeists

Joe Biden making a “pledge to be a president who seeks not to divide but to unify,” seems rich coming from someone representing a political party which has been unremittingly intent on undermining the 45th president since before day one. But there it is. On the left, hypocrisy never flags.

I am not, of course, an American but I do make claim to being an irredeemably deplorable conservative chump. As such, I have beliefs. Here is a short selective account.

The way we were.

What else do I or don’t I believe? Lots actually. But you get the picture. And I’d like to think, and do think, that my beliefs are shared, to a very great extent, by people on the conservative side of the political spectrum. But many people don’t share them. In fact, it is safe to say, those belonging to the modern left share none of them. The two sets of beliefs are non-intersecting.

In the west, there is no longer one defining spirit and mood of the times. There are two. Truly, we are a house (acrimoniously) divided. Thus, calls for the U.S. population or the population of any western nation to come together in unity is pie-in-the-sky.

Let me put it this way. Will those on the political left ever be happy to go along with conservative government? It’s a silly question. They have an agenda and it doesn’t include kumbaya get-togethers with their political opponents.

The way we are.

How about those who collectively might be called right of centre? Okay, there are many milquetoasts-cum-pantywaists in this eclectic category of people. They are easily peeled off to become useful idiots on behalf of the left; e.g., John Kasich, Jeff Flake, Mitt Romney, among political notables in the US. However, stalwart conservatives simply can’t buy any of the left’s bill of goods.

Consider the antithesis of each of the beliefs which I set out above. Put them together and what do you get? A destructive empire of lies; undermining the values which have served us so well for so long. Hard to swallow. How can anyone swallow them? Many evidently can.

Give or take, half the United States votes left. And this isn’t the left of such a little way back as the time of Bill Clinton. This is the modern loony version, exemplified by the Squad and the 110-page Biden - Sanders manifesto.

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

It’s an amazing document. I was struck by a comparison of Australia’s scheme in 2009 to help the economy out of recession and increase the energy efficiency of houses, by providing the installation of free insulating ceiling batts, with a much grander U.S. scheme, of “upgrades to up to two million low-income households [and to] incentivize tens of billions of dollars in private-sector investment to retrofit four million buildings.” What could possibly go wrong?

In Australia a lot went wrong in a short space of time. Four deaths and ninety-four house fires later the so-called “pink-batts scheme” was quickly canned. There’s electrical wire in those roof spaces and, overnight, lots of ill-trained wannabes became batt installers.

Of course, I have barely touched on the madness in the manifesto. And before you say no-one reads this kind of thing, the universities are churning out people who don’t have to. They live and breathe its destructive dystopian drivel and go on to occupy every nook and cranny of influence.

The political battle is no longer between adversaries who have broad objectives in common. And, make no mistake, the battle is uneven. Among the political class, stalwart conservatives are a declining breed. A potential saving is that their values and policies are still broadly in sync with the instincts of blue-collar and agricultural workers and, more generally, with that body of the population which through religious faith or through life experiences has managed to retain their common sense despite the onslaught of absurd wokeness. Does this offer a chance to hold back the leftist tide? Can the tide ever be turned?

The way we're headed.

I used to think Trump was the last best hope, as slim as it was. Without at all counting him out at this stage, I can’t afford to think that now. The fight has to be fought however slim the chances of victory. Covid exposes the leftist creed for what it is: cowardly, mean, miserable and godless. Evidently, those on the left can never get enough of masking, social distancing, hand-sanitizing, lockdowns, curfews, any and all rules restricting freedom; including, notably, the freedom to worship. Compliant and dependent, searching for safety in a government womb.

Idolatry had many forms in the past. Golden idols loomed large. Money is a more modern manifestation. Both seem less foul than genuflecting to government. Whining to be kept safe by the nanny state is not edifying.

The Day of the Conman

British writer Frederick Forsyth, best known for his thrillers, The Day of the Jackal, The Odessa File, and The Dogs of War, is now 81, and so has seen something of life: former RAF pilot, journalist and putative op for MI6. Like everyone over the age of 50, he understands that the response to the Dreaded Covid has been not only absurdly overwrought, but is in fact downright malignant.

Here he is today in Britain's Daily Express:

He's right, of course. It is a con -- the greatest, most destructive con of all time, designed to destroy the world's economies by falsely elevating "safety" above all else and persuading the feminized societies of the West to meekly submit to the diktats of petty bureaucrats and arbitrary tyrants.

And remember -- this is only the beginning what they've got planned for all of us. If we're going to fight back, the time is right now.