'Pandemic' Truths: Time for a New Narrative

The evidence is pouring in:

In an open letter published in Natural Selections, Wyoming paramedic Jordan Hayes compellingly argues that there should be, not only religious exemptions, but scientific exemptions to mandatory vaccination, for at least two obvious reasons: “The current crop of mRNA tech is designed for a version of the virus no longer in circulation,” and “The mRNA tech does not durably prevent transmission of even the version it was designed for.”

There's a difference, you know.

Statistics relating to “all cause mortality” make it clear that Covid mortality rates have been vastly exaggerated. The harm caused by the clumsy omnibus response to the pandemic far exceeds the suffering attributed to the virus. Delayed medical treatments and suspicious post-vaccine deaths are not calculated by the CDC and the FDA, which “determine on a case-by-case basis whether reported adverse events can be attributed to the vaccine” rather than dealing with large comparative figures and significant numbers of similar events—thus leaving a false impression of vaccine safety.

A Danish study shows that “the effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines against omicron is actually negative. The Pfizer vaccine makes recipients 76.5 percent more likely and the Moderna recipients 39.3 percent more likely to be infected than unvaccinated people.”

Pfizer’s 95 percent vaccine effectiveness claim is drastically wrong. According to Pfizer’s own numbers, the absolute risk reduction in the unvaccinated control group (0.88 percent)  compared to the test group (0.84 percent), is statistically insignificant, providing a net benefit of only 0.04 percent. But Pfizer gave the relative risk reduction number, that is, the difference between 0.88 percent and 0.84 percent, which is 95 percent. Moreover, the trial was “unblinded” after only two months rather than the stipulated three years, so that there was no longer a viable placebo group and thus no way to assess long term effectiveness and safety. Indeed, after six months, the inoculated group showed an increase in illness and mortality. 

As the CanadianCovidCare Alliance reports, “Pfizer's own 6 month report data on its COVID-19 inoculation shows greater illness and death in the inoculation arm than the placebo arm”—plus poor trial design, missing data, underpowered studies, passive surveillance and more. And it’s getting worse. Dr. Mark Trozzi exposes Pfizer’s “missing information,” grudgingly released by the FDA, which shows between 87.5 percent and 100 percent abortions and premature deaths of babies during preliminary trials involving injected pregnant women. 

She's got a point.

Pulmonary specialist Dr. Peter Kory reports that CV19 injections are “not safe, not effective” and are causing an escalating number of deaths.  Dr. Kory warns that “you are starting to see it in actuarial data with life insurance companies. The life insurance companies have been paying out claims like they never have before.” Actuarial tables don’t lie. Dr. Kory points out that government agencies are suffering from “regulatory capture” by Big Pharma “while disregarding cheaper, safer and more effective drugs.” The “war” on re-purposed drugs like Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin is ongoing. It is revealing that the FDA initially insisted on waiting 55 years before releasing vaccine-related documents.

Lockdowns don’t work. An extensive meta-study performed by three acknowledged experts showed conclusively that “based on the stringency index studies, we find little to no evidence that mandated lockdowns in Europe and the United States had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality rates.” The same is true of SIPOs (Shelter-in-Place Orders) and NPIs (Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions). Writing in the Brownstone Institute, Joakim Book suns up: Lockdowns “are not worth the hassle, the pain, the societal upheaval, the misery and human suffering that accompanied them.” 

In an article for The Globe and Mail, Norman Doidge carefully dissects the destructive failings of the official and medical response to the pandemic. He is, admittedly, careful not to offend: Gates is “Mr. Gates”; the Pfizer 95 percent claim is taken at face value; the vaccines have “limits” rather than massive casualties; Israel’s third booster helped “beat back” the Delta wave when it did no such thing as cases continue to skyrocket.

Yes, but so what?

But he underscores the manifest fiasco and bankruptcy of the Covid industry in meticulous detail, for example: inexpensive and generic early treatments were not considered because they had no pharmaceutic sponsors; the original vaccine trials were woefully inadequate and unreliable in many different ways; breakthrough infections have proliferated among the vaccinated; “too many shots might cause immune system fatigue” and much more. He concludes that the Covid master narrative was irremediably flawed and its justification is now gone. Despite his diplomatic approach, the article provides a thorough dismantling of the Covid master narrative, and announces that a new, more nuanced narrative must replace it.

The new narrative, one imagines, would go something like this:

The new narrative, however, is far from generally accepted and will run into formidable opposition from the architects of the Great Reset, in particular chairman of the World Economic Forum Klaus Schwab and his army of wealthy and influential cohorts. 

Der Klaus, zu befehlen.

According to famed German economist Christian Woolf, the pandemic shutdown was part of a larger strategy whose purpose was to collapse the world economy and bring in a digital or programmable currency controlled by a central bank. “What we are witnessing now,” Woolf writes, “is an attempt to provoke the greatest social chaos by every conceivable means, to wait until the chaos has reached its maximum intensity, and then, with the help of a panacea called ‘universal basic income’, to move from a situation of maximum chaos to one of total control.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has arrived at the same conclusion. The official Covid response mechanism was pre-planned and deployed to further the aims of the Great Reset. When one recalls that many world leaders and influential individuals are graduates of Schwab’s Young Global Leaders school, including Angela Merkel, Jacinda Ardern, Tony Blair, Emmanuel Macron, Justin Trudeau, Boris Johnson, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg and many more, global and procedural uniformity among 186 countries becomes understandable.

But all is not lost. Woolf believes that “the plans of the elite, and the vision of Klaus Schwab” can be defeated as the public gradually awaken to the destruction being planned for them.

The scaffolding of lies is crumbling before our eyes” and we are observing the gradual “disintegration of the [old] narrative.

By dint of a continuing and vigorous campaign mounted by scrupulous and erudite thinkers, brave internet souls and courageous medical specialists, and despite the black cumulus of censorship and deceit, information is coming out. People who have endured privation under the Covid autocrats or lost everything to government mandates and a dogmatic class of health officers will be part of the resistance vanguard, like the Trucker Freedom Convoy in Canada and elsewhere, or the citizens of New Orleans who are presently suing their mayor.

The vector of resentment against arbitrary authority is spiking. With effort and determination, the new narrative of reason and integrity may come to supplant the old narrative of disaster and control.

A Timely Warning

Andrew Pollard, one of the developers of the AstraZeneca vaccine, recently addressed a U.K. parliamentary group with a timely warning. What the virus will throw up next, he said, “is a variant which is perhaps even better at transmitting in vaccinated populations [and which is] even more of a reason not to be making a vaccine program around herd immunity.” Further, “[w]e need to get used to the concept that this will become what we call an endemic disease rather than a pandemic disease. A disease that is with us all the time—probably transmits seasonally a bit like influenza where we see winter outbreaks.”

In the technical terminology of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, “the ongoing universal mass vaccination program will soon promote dominant propagation of highly infectious, neutralization escape mutants,” which will “no longer offer any protection to immunized individuals whereas high infectious pressure will continue to suppress the innate immune defense system of the nonvaccinated.” In other words, in an ironic reversal of popular thinking, the unvaccinated are at risk of vaccinated transmission. A study in Nature offers tentative support for his prognosis. Bossche has been much maligned by his detractors as a “doomsday prophet” but his basic research, though predictably contested, appears plausible.

This is a hard pill to swallow for the current crop of diehard vaccinologists, who will labor to obscure the issue with meretricious stats. The political echelon and the medical establishment are engaged in an act of truth-formation, that is, a kind of credible dissimulation, forming a story, as Albert Norton Jr. observes in another context, by “selectively assembling and spinning facts and inferences to support it,” thus diluting our “intuition of significance.” 

To take one example, as Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, former chair of Medical Microbiology at the University of Mainz, writes, deaths due to other factors than SARS-CoV-2 were regularly recorded as owing to Coronavirus—“The numbers may have been grossly exaggerated.” Covid fatality numbers were routinely inflated by the inclusion of unrelated morbidities. The CDC, for another example, will begin to count anyone who was hospitalized or died within two weeks of getting the jab as “unvaccinated.”

No less troubling, many governments have embarked on a scorched earth policy, vowing to keep restrictions in place until the virus is totally eliminated. But as Pollard points out, the push to reach “Covid zero” is a fool’s errand, for the virus, according to many such competent professionals, is like the seasonal flu and the common cold and will be with us in perpetuity. Dr. Peter McCullough, among the world’s most widely published medical scholars, stated before the Texas Senate Health and Human Services Committee that the disease cannot be defeated, but with the proper approach and treatment it can be managed. Over-the-counter supplements, including Vitamin D3, Vitamin C, Quercetin, Zinc and aspirin and, as the Great Barrington Declaration recommends, “focused protection” for the elderly, are far more sensible alternatives than the present foolhardy therapeutic agenda of masks, lockdowns, injectable products and discriminatory passports.

Sweden gets it right. As Kevin Downey Jr. remarks, “One would think the world would take notice, and tips, from a country with no lockdowns, a healthy economy, and comparatively few deaths… While people worldwide are rioting against despotic Covid lockdowns and mandates, Swedes are enjoying cocktails after returning home from work, just like they have been since the beginning of the pandemic.” History professor and blogger Tom Woods shows that “this year Sweden, even during the Delta phase of all this, where mitigation measures have been light at best and schools have been open without masks or distancing, excess mortality has actually been lower than normal.” Woods includes a comparative graph contrasting Sweden to the U.S.:

And as of September 10, Denmark will be lifting all Covid restrictions, including vaccine passports. 

Our political leaders and health officials are not paying attention. They are determined to implement policies that have little chance of success and whose primary effect will be to exacerbate an already dire situation—the vulnerability of the already vaccinated, the trauma of viral transmission, the constant irruption of ever new variants, and the creation of two classes or “varnas” of citizens resembling India’s Brahmins and Shudras. In at least partial confirmation of such debilities, Public Health England provides much pertinent information on the issue.

If, in their blind pursuit of an elusive solution, the powers that be do not consider a course correction even at the eleventh hour, a social, medical and attendant economic disaster now well into its second year will persist into the indefinite future, and life as this generation knew it will likely never return to what we once called “normal.”